| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Date: | 2013-05-23 01:01:56 |
| Message-ID: | 519D6A84.7050707@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from
>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the m500 is
>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes written (TBW),
>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years .
>
> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb
> price point).
According the the data sheet it is power safe.
http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650
http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-23 01:32:29 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-05-23 00:17:26 | Re: Very slow inner join query Unacceptable latency. |