Re: The case for version number inflation

From: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Date: 2013-02-28 18:04:24
Message-ID: 512F9C28.9070704@2ndQuadrant.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Il 27/02/13 23:55, Josh Berkus ha scritto:
> I'm beginning to think that no matter how much *I* like our version
> numbering scheme, it's hurting us with users because they see the last
> three releases as "version 9".
I kinda like that I can use my soccer-like jersey with "Postgres" and
the number 9 on the back for 5 years! :)

Ciao,
Gabriele

--
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it | www.2ndQuadrant.it

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-02-28 19:16:02 Re: The case for version number inflation
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-02-28 17:01:19 Re: The case for version number inflation