Re: Time for an autoconf update

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time for an autoconf update
Date: 2013-02-08 18:43:43
Message-ID: 5115475F.7050906@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/8/13 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64,
> which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
>
> We are behind the curve.

What they actually mean is that they need config.guess and config.sub
that is shipped with autoconf 2.69. But the ones in the postgresql
source tree are already of the required version.

The reason I haven't been pushing for autoconf updates in a while is
that the release notes of recent versions consist mostly of "fix
regression in previous release" and no actual features that would be of
use in PostgreSQL's configure script. This should be revisited from
time to time, but it's probably better to do that near the beginning of
a development cycle.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Lezhnjov IV 2013-02-08 18:56:15 backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-08 18:41:22 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs