Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label
Date: 2013-01-24 04:38:17
Message-ID: 5100BAB9.3080909@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/23/2013 8:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, in Fedora-land I see:
>
> F16: 2.1.6 (F16 will go out of support next month)
> F17: 2.1.10 (F17 has been stable for 6+ months)
> F18: 2.1.12 (F18 just went stable)
>
> While requiring 2.1.10 today might be thought a tad leading-edge,
> will that still be true by the time we ship 9.3?

I'd be far more interested in what is in RHEL and CentOS. Fedora,
with its 6 month obsolescence cycle, is of zero interest to me for
deploying database servers.

EL6 has libselinux 2.0.94
EL5 has libselinux 1.33.4

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-01-24 05:01:33 Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-01-24 04:32:24 Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label