Re: .gitignore additions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: .gitignore additions
Date: 2013-01-23 13:59:13
Message-ID: 50FFECB1.6090501@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 01/23/2013 08:47 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Would a committer be willing to pop some entries in .gitignore for
>>> Windows native build outputs?
>>>
>>> *.sln
>>> *.vcproj
>>> *.vcxproj
>>>
>>> It'd make life easier when testing Windows changes.
>> While they're at it, it'd be nice to have tags from ctags (via our
>> tools or otherwise) get ignored globally, along with cscope.out , as
>> follows:
>>
>> tags
>> /cscope.out
>>
> +1 on cscope.out!
>

There doesn't seem anything postgres-specific about these. Pretty much
everything we list is a byproduct of a standard build, not some other
tool. "man gitignore" says

Patterns which a user wants git to ignore in all situations (e.g.,
backup or temporary files generated by the user’s editor of choice)
generally go into a file specified by core.excludesfile in the
user’s ~/.gitconfig.

I would think tags files and cscope.out probably come into that
category, although I don't have terribly strong feelings about it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Sorber 2013-01-23 14:01:45 Re: .gitignore additions
Previous Message Phil Sorber 2013-01-23 13:47:47 Re: .gitignore additions