Re: Insert Performance with WAL and Fsync

From: Mike Schroepfer <mike(at)raplix(dot)com>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Schroepfer <mike(at)raplix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Insert Performance with WAL and Fsync
Date: 2002-01-11 01:22:29
Message-ID: 50D1DD22A3646047A6282C10311585123D0715@mail01.raplix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > b.3) output of vmstat 5 during b.1:
>
> > procs memory page disk
> faults cpu
> > r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr s0 s1 s6 -- in
> sy cs us sy
> > id
> > 0 0 0 2140760 1820952 2 15 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 430
> 130 71 1 1
> > 99
> > 0 0 0 2093696 1690392 15 128 0 91 91 0 0 128 0 0 0 1232
> 1886 894 11 3
> > 86
>
> What are the "disk" numbers in this variant of vmstat? Given the low
> CPU usage, one would hope that your disk is going flat out ... but if
> 128 is page transfers per second, it's not very impressive...

here's iostat:
Its 184.8 io/s (8kpages) = 1.1mb/s - 92% busy. Not too impressive. I'm
following up too see if something is misconfigured.

device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b tin tout us
sy wt id
sd0 0.0 184.6 0.0 1145.3 0.0 1.7 9.0 0 92 0 116 13
3 20 64

Thanks again,

Mike

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-01-11 07:45:07 Home Location Registry (HLR) and VLR databases
Previous Message Jelan 2002-01-11 01:06:02 Re: URGENT: pg_dump & Postgres 7.2b4