Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2012-11-17 01:41:55
Message-ID: 50A6EB63.9020208@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> You could make that same claim about plain views, but in point of
> fact the demand for making them work in COPY has been minimal.
> So I'm not convinced this is an essential first-cut feature.
> We can always add it later.

Of course. I just had the impression that we could support COPY FROM by
*deleting* a couple lines from Kevin's patch, rather than it being extra
work.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-11-17 03:31:51 Re: foreign key locks
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2012-11-17 01:35:10 Re: Do we need so many hint bits?