Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility
Date: 2012-10-22 19:58:37
Message-ID: 5085A56D.2090707@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/19/12 1:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> What I'm saying is, we'll get nowhere promoting an application queue
> which is permanently inferior to existing, popular open source software.
> My advice: Forget about the application queue aspects of this. Focus
> on making it work for replication and matviews, which are already hard
> use cases to optimize.
>
> If someone can turn this feature into the base for a distributed
> queueing system later, then great. But let's not complicate this
> feature by worrying about a use case it may never fulfill.

And as someone else mentioned... we should call this a stream and not a queue, since this would be lacking in many queue features.

It certainly sounds like a useful framework to have.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-10-22 20:17:42 Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2012-10-22 19:47:37 Re: [PATCH] Prefetch index pages for B-Tree index scans