| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PUG Listing? |
| Date: | 2012-10-10 18:51:50 |
| Message-ID: | 5075C3C6.5080205@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> Getting the pug list done would be minimal work. Unless we plan on relaunching the pugs.postgresql.org site, It would probably be a better endeavor to take the data models, simplify them slightly, and put them into the main -www codebase, as well as the listing code.
Yeah, I guess the question is: is there any value in having a blog
listing for all the PUGs? I know that SFPUG wasn't using ours because
it was Just Another Darned Place To Post Things. However, other PUGs
may have felt differently.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-10-10 18:57:31 | Re: PUG Listing? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2012-10-10 18:44:35 | Re: PUG Listing? |