Re: ARC patent
| From: |
"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
| To: |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: |
"Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,"pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: |
Re: ARC patent |
| Date: |
2005-01-17 08:04:49 |
| Message-ID: |
5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE56231@rodrick.geeknet.com.au (view raw or flat) |
| Thread: |
|
| Lists: |
pgsql-hackers |
> > FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the patent
> > application is still pending, although the USPTO site is a
> little hard to grok):
>
> http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040098541%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040098541&RS=DN/20040098541
How will this affect the release of 8.0?
Wasn't this implemented in the early stages of the 7.5 cycle, long before may 20?
... John
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2005-01-17 08:14:31 |
| Subject: Re: ARC patent |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2005-01-17 07:40:19 |
| Subject: Re: pgdump |
