Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Date: 2005-10-03 18:22:54
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A939E@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout Wrote:

> Has it actually happened to you? PostgreSQL is pretty good
> about its memory usage. Besides, seems to me it should be an
> system admisitrator descision.

No, Just came across this by chance, and thought it might be a good
idea.
Perhaps as a postgresql.conf setting.

... John

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Frost 2005-10-03 18:25:25 Replaying archived wal files after a dump restore?
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-10-03 17:15:33 Re: RPMs for RedHat ES3.0