Re: pg_reorg in core?

From: "M(dot)Sakamoto" <sakamoto_masahiko_b1(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date: 2012-09-21 08:45:44
Message-ID: 505C2938.9090902@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,
I'm sakamoto, maintainer of reorg.

>> What could be also great is to move the project directly into github to
>> facilitate its maintenance and development.
>No argument from me there, especially as I have my own fork in github,
>but that's up to the current maintainers.
Yup, I am thinking development on CVS(onPgfoundry) is a bit awkward for
me and github would be a suitable place.

To be honest, we have little available development resources, so
no additional features are added recently. But features and fixes to
be done piled up, which Josh sums up.

In the short term, within this month I'll release minor versionup
of reorg to support PostgreSQL 9.2. And I think it's the time to
reconsider the way we maintain pg_reorg.
It's happy that Josh and Michael are interested in reorg,
and I wish you to be a maintainer :)

I think we can discuss at reorg list.

M.Sakamoto NTT OSS Center

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rural Hunter 2012-09-21 09:16:46 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2012-09-21 08:33:53 Re: 64-bit API for large object