Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> First, note the change in topic.
>
> This whole discussion has gone rather far afield from Miroslav's
> original submission, which was for temporal tables, which is NOT
> the same thing as audit logs, although the use cases overlap
> significantly.
I don't think the concerns I raised about apparent order of
execution for serializable transactions apply to audit logs. If
we've moved entirely off the topic of the original subject, it is a
complete non-issue.
-Kevin