Re: isolation check takes a long time

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: isolation check takes a long time
Date: 2012-07-20 17:51:29
Message-ID: 50099AA1.5020705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 07/20/2012 01:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie jul 20 13:15:12 -0400 2012:
>> On 07/19/2012 09:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I would like to remove the prepared_transactions test from
>>> the main isolation schedule, and add a new Make target which runs that
>>> test explicitly. Is there any objection to that?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Here's the patch for that.
> Looks reasonable. I'd like to have an "include" directive in regress
> files so that we don't have to repeat the whole set in the second file,
> but please don't let that wishlist item to stop you from committing this
> patch.
>
> Are you planning to have one of your animals run the prepared xacts
> schedule? :-)
>

Possibly - I'm tossing up in my mind the best way to do that. (Hacking
the script on a particular client would be the wrong way.)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-07-20 17:52:20 Re: Restrict ALTER FUNCTION CALLED ON NULL INPUT (was Re: Not quite a security hole: CREATE LANGUAGE for non-superusers)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-07-20 17:39:34 Re: isolation check takes a long time