Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Date: 2012-07-18 20:22:43
Message-ID: 50071B13.5010205@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.07.2012 02:00, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Heikki Linnakangas<
> heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Can you do something about TrickFunctionCall2, please? (
>> http://archives.postgresql.**org/message-id/4FE2C968.**
>> 2010503(at)enterprisedb(dot)com<http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4FE2C968.2010503@enterprisedb.com>)
>> A separate patch to refactor that in the existing gist opclass would
>> probably be best.
>
> Done. There are separate patch for get rid of TrickFunctionCall2 and
> version of SP-GiST for ranges based on that patch.

Committed the get-rid-of-TrickFunctionCall2 patch. I also changed one
call in range_gist_same(), which was not using TrickFunctionCall2 but
was nevertheless doing the same thing in spirit.

I'll try to take a look at the other patch in the next few days.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-18 20:42:48 Re: row literal problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-18 19:59:49 bgwriter, regression tests, and default shared_buffers settings