From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? |
Date: | 2003-04-24 01:37:23 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20030424113704.02a564b0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 07:55 PM 23/04/2003 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>All things considered, it was probably a good idea that they removed bit
>strings in SQL200x.
Did they replace them with any kind of open-ended bit vector?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-24 02:59:50 | Re: query optimization scenarios 17,701 times faster!!! |
Previous Message | Philip Yarra | 2003-04-24 00:24:25 | Re: ECPG thread-safety |