Re: DB Tuning Notes - Where To?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DB Tuning Notes - Where To?
Date: 2002-12-14 00:28:27
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20021214112245.02b45348@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 08:55 PM 13/12/2002 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>The frequency of vacuum and analyze would seem to belong..
>...max_fsm_relations belongs...
>...Setting max_fsm_pages also belongs in that list...
>...parts that refer to the VACUUM output should be put... near the Routine
>Vacuuming

Not sure I like this idea at all.

The stuff I have written is in a practical order and makes a complete whole
- each section refers to information obtained in previous sections.

I have no objection to putting links in the sections you listed, indicating
'this is also discussed in XXX (Managing Server Resources)'...

>----------------------------------------------------------------

Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-12-14 00:32:09 Information schema now available
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-12-14 00:27:29 Re: Creating a zero-column table