Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <rtreat(at)webmd(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...
Date: 2002-12-10 01:29:35
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20021210122828.02d19a90@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 12:17 PM 10/12/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
>Secondly, an empty database contains 98 tables,

Corrected based on Tom's later mail; from the FSM PoV, it contains 37
(indices don't count). So it is exhausted when more than two DBs are created.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Shattuck 2002-12-10 01:34:01 Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...
Previous Message Philip Warner 2002-12-10 01:17:48 Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...