Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-02 14:07:16
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20021003000600.051a6d48@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 09:42 AM 2/10/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
>Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc.

Does silence mean people agree? Does it also mean someone is doing this
(eg. whoever did the off_t support)? Or does it mean somebody else needs to
do it?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2002-10-02 14:08:34 Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-10-02 14:02:05 Re: [GENERAL] New PostgreSQL Website : advocacy.postgresql.org