From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Java class documentation |
Date: | 2001-02-24 17:47:00 |
Message-ID: | 5.0.2.1.0.20010224174419.009f8ba0@mail.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-jdbc |
At 22:07 22/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>I've started to finish up the not-marked-up-yet parts of the JDBC
>documentation, but most of this seems to have once been generated by
>javadoc, and I feel like it is probably a wasted effort to try to manually
>convert this to DocBook.
Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs
from scratch (so much has changed since those were written).
>AFAIK, there is currently no Javadoc to DocBook converter available. This
>might be a worthwhile project, though.
>
>Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
>source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
>JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
>users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?
Already a work in progress. You might be duplicating work already being
done for the jdbc site.
Peter
>--
>Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 18:03:03 | Re: Java class documentation |
Previous Message | Survey-Admin@ATT-CustomerSat.com | 2001-02-24 17:13:25 | flowchart 404 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 18:03:03 | Re: Java class documentation |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 17:43:41 | Re: Fw: jdbc.postgresql.org/docs/ |