Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: jmscott(at)yahoo(dot)com (jmscott(at)REMOVEMEyahoo(dot)com)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-20 03:34:03
Message-ID: 4ae2330f.0107191934.c43fbb@posting.google.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org (Lamar Owen) wrote in message news:<01071818103609(dot)00973(at)lowen(dot)wgcr(dot)org>...

> [trimmed cc:list]

> On Wednesday 18 July 2001 17:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > OK, we need to vote on whether Oid's are optional, and whether we can

> > have them not created by default.

>

> [All the below IMHO]

>

> OID's should be optional.

yep. we don't depend upon oids > 32 bits. that's pretty standard
practice for serious db apps. however, tx limit is a real problem.

my vote is for solving the tx limit before chaning the oid problem.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Howe 2001-07-20 06:34:00 Large queries - again...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-20 03:18:06 hub.org out of disk space