| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants? |
| Date: | 2012-06-24 18:56:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4FE762D1.6060209@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.06.2012 21:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-24 at 20:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I just committed the patch to change XLogRecPtr into a 64-bit constant,
>> and I did this in the patch:
>>
>> #define XLogSegmentsPerXLogId (0x100000000LL / XLOG_SEG_SIZE)
>>
>> But I started to wonder, is that LL representation the preferred way to
>> define 64-bit integer constants? I thought it is, but now that I grep
>> around, I don't see any constants like that in the source tree.
>
> See INT64CONST, UINT64CONST.
Thanks, fixed.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-24 20:05:20 | Re: warning handling in Perl scripts |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-24 18:40:51 | warning handling in Perl scripts |