Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Date: 2012-05-27 19:54:24
Message-ID: 4FC28670.5050805@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27-05-2012 10:45, Fujii Masao wrote:
> OK, let me propose another approach: add pg_size_pretty(int).
> If we do this, all usability and performance problems will be solved.
>
I wouldn't like to add another function but if it solves both problems... +1.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-05-27 21:46:53 Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-27 19:53:35 Re: Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption