Re: Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split
Date: 2012-05-14 07:30:37
Message-ID: 4FB0B49D.3070503@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.05.2012 23:52, Noah Misch wrote:
> Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
> MyPgXact. This patch attempts to cover all such cases. In some places, a
> comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
> structures. I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
> depending on how I judged the emphasis.
>
> The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
> GlobalTransaction. I updated a few comments accordingly.
>
> The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
> is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.
>
> I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.

Thanks, applied!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-05-14 09:32:35 Re: WalSndWakeup() and synchronous_commit=off
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2012-05-14 07:21:20 Re: Analyzing foreign tables & memory problems