Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I like Marti's idea. At present, making his idea work could easily
> mean checksums sink, so not sure whether to attempt to make that
> work in detail.
For my part, improving bulk load performance and TRUNCATE
transactional semantics would trump checksums. If we have to defer
one or the other to a later release, I would prefer that we bump
checksums.
While I understand the desire for checksums, and understand others
have had situations where they would have helped, so far I have yet
to run into a situation where I feel they would have helped me. The
hint bit and freeze issues require ongoing attention and have real
performance consequences on a regular basis. And closing the window
for odd transactional semantics on TRUNCATE versus DELETE of all
rows in a table would be one less thing to worry about, in my world.
-Kevin