| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-02-20 22:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4F42CDF5.40406@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Guys, are we talking about an on-disk format change? If so, this may
>> need to be kicked out of 9.2 ...
>
> Yes, we are. Simon's gone to some pains to make it backward
> compatible, but IMHO it's a lot messier and less future-proof than it
> could be with some more work, and if we commit this patch than we WILL
> be stuck with this for a very long time.
Yeah. I'd personally prefer to boot this to 9.3, then. It's not like
there's not enough features for 9.2, and I really don't want this
feature to cause 5 others to be delayed.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-20 23:02:37 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-20 22:20:55 | Re: Future of our regular expression code |