Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dan Ports" <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC
Date: 2012-02-14 15:34:09
Message-ID: 4F3A2A9102000025000454FC@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> This would tend to be more than a little inconvenient until the
> prepared statements pending at crash or shutdown were all
> committed or rolled back.

[sigh]

Probably obvious, but to avoid confusion:

s/prepared statements/prepared transactions/

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-02-14 16:11:20 Re: pg_test_fsync performance
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2012-02-14 15:27:58 Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC