Re: BGWriter latch, power saving

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BGWriter latch, power saving
Date: 2012-01-27 07:16:52
Message-ID: 4F224F64.7000100@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.01.2012 21:37, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 26 January 2012 16:48, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Ok, committed with some further cleanup.
>>
>> Do you think the docs need to be updated for this, and if so,
>> where? The only place I found in the docs that speak about how the
>> bgwriter works is in config.sgml, where bgwriter_delay is
>> described. Want to suggest an update to that?
>
> This new behaviour might warrant a mention, as in the attached
> doc-patch.

Hmm, the word "hibernate" might confuse people in this context. I
committed this as:

> It then sleeps for <varname>bgwriter_delay</> milliseconds, and
> repeats. When there are no dirty buffers in the buffer pool, though,
> it goes into a longer sleep regardless of <varname>bgwriter_delay</>.

Thanks!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2012-01-27 08:57:01 Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2012-01-27 04:45:15 Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage