Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-01-10 04:27:28
Message-ID: 4F0BBE30.4030707@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/7/12 5:26 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Perhaps there
> needs to be a third setting, calculate-but-dont-verify, where CRCs are
> updated but existing CRCs are not expected to be correct. And a utility
> to scan through your database and fix any incorrect CRCs, so that after
> that's run in calculate-but-dont-verify mode, you can safely turn
> checksums on.

The users of any feature like this are eventually going to demand a
"scrubbing" utility that validates the checksums in a background task.
Doing something like pg_dump just to validate your copy of the data is
still clean is not a great approach. If you accept that sort of utility
is inevitable, you might as well presume it could handle this sort of
task eventually too.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-01-10 05:00:20 Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby
Previous Message Greg Smith 2012-01-10 04:16:02 Re: WIP(!) Double Writes