Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2011-12-10 07:49:40
Message-ID: 4EE30F14.2070507@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/07/2011 02:34 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I think that only the owner of foreign table can keep collation
> consistent between foreign and local, like data type of column. We need to
> support per-column-collation on foreign tables too, or should deny pushing
> down condition which is collation-sensitive...
>

I am not sure about what next step you were planning here. Are you
thinking to block this sort of push-down in an update to your feature
patch, or does some more serious work on foreign table collation need to
happen first instead?

It looks like there has been some good discussion of this feature here,
but there is still some work needed before it will be ready to commit.
Hanada-san, did you get the feedback you were looking for here yet, or
are there things you still wanted to discuss? It is not clear to me
what happens next; I would appreciate your comment on that.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2011-12-10 08:47:53 Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-10 03:32:09 Why do regression tests now leave "regress_test_role_super" around?