Re: new compiler warnings

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings
Date: 2011-10-18 16:29:45
Message-ID: 4E9D63290200002500042188@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> And it would break the code. The whole point here is that the
> message must be sent indivisibly.

If the new code splits the message, it would previously have been
truncated. Is that less broken?

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-10-18 16:39:06 Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-18 16:26:51 Re: new compiler warnings