Re: citext operator precedence fix

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date: 2011-09-23 16:37:29
Message-ID: 4E7CB5C9.3050008@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I'm OK with the proposed behavior change and I agree that it's
> probably what people want, but I am awfully suspicious that those
> extra casts are going to break something you haven't thought about.
> It might be worth posting a rough version first just to see if I (or
> someone else) can break it before you spend a lot of time on it.

Additional breakage confirmed (hash functions, etc.) Looks like I need
to add a lot more support functions and test. This is still worth
doing, but don't expect it for the next commitfest.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-09-23 16:38:27 Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-09-23 16:37:18 Re: Single pass vacuum - take 2