From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |
Date: | 2011-09-13 19:55:25 |
Message-ID: | 4E6FB52D.7000005@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/13/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
> The ability to restore a table from a backup file to a different
> table
> name in the same database and schema.
>
>
> This can be done but agreed it is not intuitive.
>
>
> Can you elaborate on tha a bit, please? The only way I've been able to
> do it is to edit the dump file to change the table name. That's not
> very practical with a several gigabyte dump file, even less so with one
> that is much larger. If this capability already exists, is it documented?
You use the -Fc method, extract the TOC and edit just the TOC (so you
don't have to edit a multi-gig file)
>
> (SqlPlus has this, even though it isn't very pretty.)
>
> A built-in report writer, capable of things like column totals.
>
> There are a billion and one tools that do this without us having to
> reinvent the wheel. Why would we support that?
>
>
> There are other databases out there, too, why reinvent the wheel by
> working on PostgreSQL? :-)
>
> The question shoud be, would this be USEFUL?
Personally, I don't think so but others may disagree.
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo Gonzalez | 2011-09-13 20:02:29 | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-13 19:52:57 | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |