| From: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Large C files |
| Date: | 2011-09-06 23:22:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4E66AB35.8040208@wulczer.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/09/11 01:13, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 6 September 2011 08:29, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> I was thinking about splitting up plpython.c, but it's not even on that
>> list. ;-)
>
> IIRC the obesity of that file is something that Jan Urbański intends
> to fix, or is at least concerned about. Perhaps you should compare
> notes.
Yeah, plpython.c could easily be splitted into submodules for builtin
functions, spi support, subtransactions support, traceback support etc.
If there is consensus that this should be done, I'll see if I can find
time to submit a giant-diff-no-behaviour-changes patch for the next CF.
Cheers,
Jan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-06 23:48:01 | Re: pgpass comment suggestion |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-09-06 23:13:52 | Re: Large C files |