From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: timestamptz parsing bug? |
Date: | 2011-08-29 19:43:57 |
Message-ID: | 4E5BEBFD.4090800@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/29/2011 03:35 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> When it gets to the timezone "America/Chicago" at the end, this is
>>> handled in the DTK_DATE case, because of the "/". But because ptype is
>>> still set, it is expecting this to be an ISO time, so it errors out.
>> Do we actually *want* to support this? The "T" is supposed to mean that
>> the string is strictly ISO-conformant, no?
> I didn't realize that appending a time zone was not conformant, but apparently it's not.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Time_zone_designators
>
> Only appending a "Z" or an offset seems to be legal. Interesting.
>
>
In that case we shouldn't be accepting an abbreviation either.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-29 20:29:39 | Re: timestamptz parsing bug? |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-08-29 19:35:25 | Re: timestamptz parsing bug? |