Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Date: 2011-07-27 15:30:02
Message-ID: 4E302EFA.2000300@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27.07.2011 17:43, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> 1(l:1) blk: 324 numTuple: 129 free: 2472b(69.71%) rightlink:4294967295
> (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 1(l:2) blk: 242 numTuple: 164 free: 932b(88.58%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 2(l:2) blk: 525 numTuple: 121 free: 2824b(65.39%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 3(l:2) blk: 70 numTuple: 104 free: 3572b(56.23%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 4(l:2) blk: 384 numTuple: 106 free: 3484b(57.30%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 5(l:2) blk: 555 numTuple: 121 free: 2824b(65.39%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 6(l:2) blk: 564 numTuple: 109 free: 3352b(58.92%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
>> 7(l:2) blk: 165 numTuple: 108 free: 3396b(58.38%)
> rightlink:4294967295 (InvalidBlockNumber)
> .....
>
> Isn't it a bug?

Yeah, looks like a bug. I must've messed up the WAL logging in my recent
changes to this. I'll look into that.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2011-07-27 15:34:21 Re: Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery))
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-27 15:21:52 Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+