On 07/22/2011 08:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 07/21/2011 11:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake"<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>> So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI
>>>> patch done for psql  and was digging around the web and have a URI
>>>> parser library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC
>>>> 3986  compliant .
>>> Surely we do not need a whole library to parse URIs.
>> Any other comments? I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have it
>> tossesd on a technicality.
> Well, you haven't explained what feature you are trying to develop, so
> it's a bit premature to speculate on whether that feature is valuable
> enough to justify the carrying cost of another library.
Yes I did:
OP of this thread:
It is letting pgsql use URI syntax.
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-07-22 15:51:03|
|Subject: Re: storing TZ along timestamps|
|Previous:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2011-07-22 15:42:23|
|Subject: Re: Environment checks prior to regression tests?|