From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Date: | 2011-07-22 15:43:47 |
Message-ID: | 4E299AB3.3050700@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/22/2011 08:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 07/21/2011 11:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> "Joshua D. Drake"<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI
>>>> patch done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI
>>>> parser library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC
>>>> 3986 [2] compliant .
>>>
>>> Surely we do not need a whole library to parse URIs.
>>
>> Any other comments? I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have it
>> tossesd on a technicality.
>
> Well, you haven't explained what feature you are trying to develop, so
> it's a bit premature to speculate on whether that feature is valuable
> enough to justify the carrying cost of another library.
Yes I did:
OP of this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01144.php
It is letting pgsql use URI syntax.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-22 15:51:03 | Re: storing TZ along timestamps |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2011-07-22 15:42:23 | Re: Environment checks prior to regression tests? |