From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Full GUID support |
Date: | 2011-07-12 23:00:06 |
Message-ID: | 4E1CD1F6.6010003@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2011 01:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/2011 03:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> What about extensions makes them less usable?
>>
>>
>> It is an extra step, that is less usable. Does it matter? Shrug, I
>> know I hate having to type apt-get just to use xyz, does it mean it is
>> a big deal? Probably not.
>
>
> By that argument we wouldn't have any extensions at all, just a
> monolithic product. I don't think that would be an advance.
By that argument, with a condition of what we are talking about. I think
what this boils down to is we look at what our competitors are doing. If
we were to change anything at all.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-07-12 23:35:53 | Re: Full GUID support |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-12 22:45:30 | Re: interval precision oddness |