Re: Full GUID support

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Full GUID support
Date: 2011-07-11 17:19:53
Message-ID: 4E1B30B9.2090706@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/10/2011 11:59 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
>> agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
>> a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
>> fashion or another :-(). Between that and the lack of portability of
>> many of the better ways, this is something I'm happy to keep at arm's
>> length.
>
> Also, I think that UUIDs fall into the class of "datatypes used by less
> than 10% of users" which should always remain extensions. I'd consider
> CITEXT for core before UUID.
>

Uh.... UUID/GUID is used pervasively throughout enterprise apps,
especially Java apps.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2011-07-11 17:26:34 Re: Launching debugger on self on SIGSEGV
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-07-11 17:09:41 Re: Select For Update and Left Outer Join