| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: procpid? |
| Date: | 2011-06-12 01:15:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4DF4131D.5020003@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/11/2011 1:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> There is a difference between a project name and something that directly
>> affects usability. +1 on fixing this. IMO, we don't create a new pid
>> column, we just fix the problem. If we do it for 9.2, we have 18 months
>> to communicate the change.
> Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't see
> why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem.
>
Because it is a very real problem with an easy fix. We have 18 months to
publicize that fix. I mean really? This is a no-brainer.
JD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-12 01:22:10 | Re: libpq SSL with non-blocking sockets |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-12 01:01:55 | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |