Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-07 21:16:50
Message-ID: 4DC5B6C2.4040102@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/07/2011 04:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:35 -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 07-05-2011 13:42, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>>> Do you need pg_config to install extensions?
>>>
>> No. But we need it to build other extensions.
> But for that you need the -dev[el] package anyway, so there would be no
> point in moving pg_config out of it.
>

pg_config is useful quite apart from its use in building things, as was
discussed upthread.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomasz Chmielewski 2011-05-07 21:19:16 Re: 'SGT DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/05DC": No such file or directory' - what to do now?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-07 21:10:25 Re: (Better) support for cross compiled external modules