Re: Background fsck

From: Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta(at)wp(dot)pl>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Background fsck
Date: 2011-04-08 05:55:51
Message-ID: 4D9EA367.7060102@wp.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
>
> In anyway, having FreeBSD to fsck, (background or not) should not happen. And the problem
> becomes bigger when cheap SATA drives will cheat about their write cache being flushed to the disk.
> So in the common case with cheap hardware, it is wise to have a UPS connected and being monitored
> by the system.
>

It's not lack of UPS. Power issues are taken care of here. It's a buggy 3ware controller which hangs
the machine ocassionally and the only way to have it come back is to power cycle, hard reset is not
enough.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2011-04-08 06:19:42 Re: Background fsck
Previous Message Scott Carey 2011-04-07 16:25:18 Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck