Re: JDBC gripe list

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>,"Quartz" <quartz12h(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC gripe list
Date: 2011-03-29 20:49:14
Message-ID: 4D91FF7A020000250003BEFB@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Quartz <quartz12h(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> "... the driver's behavior must be consistent with a particular
> DBMS, either always continuing to process commands or never
> continuing to > process commands.,,"

> "The possible implementations and return values have been modified
> in the Java 2 SDK, Standard Edition, version 1.3 to accommodate
> the option of continuing to proccess commands in a batch update
> after a BatchUpdateException obejct has been thrown. "

Unfortunately, the combination of these two requirements with the
fact that the PostgreSQL driver supports JDK 1.2 or higher means
that this option must not be allowed. We'd have to require a Java
version from this century to support that. Maybe it's time to think
about that, but we would need to commit to that before we could move
to the behavior you want.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-03-29 21:05:43 Re: JDBC gripe list
Previous Message Quartz 2011-03-29 20:34:31 Re: JDBC gripe list