| From: | Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Collations versus user-defined functions |
| Date: | 2011-03-14 14:42:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4D7E2941.8010706@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12.03.2011 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does the SQL
> standard have anything to say on the matter, or is there a precedent in
> the behavior of TSQL or other DBMSes?
Tom,
SQL standard let it open for implementers.
The other DBMS - for which I am/was collation expert - takes afair the
database/schema collation for functions/procedures - no individual
collation.
Just believe me - there is tons of user complain feedback on this
topic. I really can't recommend doing it same way. My experience
is that users want to use own collations in functions too.
Susanne
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-14 14:42:46 | Re: Macros for time magic values |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-14 14:42:04 | Re: Better estimates of index correlation |