Re: Hung Vacuum in 8.3

On 23/02/11 10:18, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 23/02/11 00:26, Greg Stark wrote:
>>
>> It's also possible there's a bug of course. If someone was using that
>> buffer and somehow failed to notify the vacuum that they were done it
>> would wait for a very long time (forever?). However if vacuum
>> eventually continued when the query was canceled then it seems likely
>> it was working as intended.
>>
>
> Greg, thanks for clarifying this.
>
> Unfortunately this time around I canceled the vacuum and then the
> query. However *next* time I'll get rid of the query 1st and see what
> happens.
>

I have another one here:

postgres=# select datname,procpid, query_start, current_query
from pg_stat_activity
where now() - query_start > '2 hours'::interval order
by query_start;
datname | procpid | query_start | current_query
---------+---------+-------------------------------+-----------------
stuff | 23957 | 2011-03-08 06:02:02.659159+13 | VACUUM ANALYZE;

postgres=# select datname,procpid, query_start, current_query
from pg_stat_activity
where now() - backend_start > '2 hours'::interval
order by query_start;
datname | procpid | query_start | current_query
---------+---------+-------------------------------+-----------------
stuff | 23957 | 2011-03-08 06:02:02.659159+13 | VACUUM ANALYZE;
:
stuff | 30018 | 2011-03-08 11:57:03.214177+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 11390 | 2011-03-08 12:27:20.390122+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 10178 | 2011-03-08 12:28:59.328265+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 5100 | 2011-03-08 12:30:10.318204+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 10255 | 2011-03-08 12:32:21.520814+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 29993 | 2011-03-08 12:32:26.562835+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 10204 | 2011-03-08 12:40:57.059958+13 | <IDLE>
stuff | 10206 | 2011-03-08 12:41:11.708924+13 | <IDLE>
(9 rows)

It looks to me like whatever query buffer pins the vacuum *was* waiting
on should be well and truly over by now. The strace for the vacuum looks
the same as before:

$ strace -p 23957
Process 23957 attached - interrupt to quit
semop(39747613, 0x7fff53d3dec0, 1

It certainly looks like the vacuum is not able to resume after setting
itself to sleep for some reason.