On 19/02/11 11:30, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Yeah, the disadvantage is that (like statement timeout) it is a 'bottom
>> of the cliff' type of protection. The advantage is there are no false
>> positives...
> Yeah, just trying to get a handle on the proposed feature. I have no
> objections; it seems like a harmless limit for most people, and useful
> to a few.
>
No worries and sorry, I should have used the "per backend" phrase in the
title to help clarify what was intended.
Cheers
Mark