Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Date: 2011-02-16 17:34:59
Message-ID: 4D5C0AC3.1010101@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.02.2011 19:29, Robert Haas wrote:
> Actually, on further reflection, I'm not even sure why we bother with
> the fsync. It seems like a useful safeguard but I'm not seeing how we
> can get to that point without having fsync'd everything anyway. Am I
> missing something?

WalRcvDie() is called on error. For example, if the connection dies
unexpectedly during walrcv_receive().

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-16 17:41:28 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-16 17:31:30 Re: contrib loose ends: 9.0 to 9.1 incompatibilities