| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
| Date: | 2011-02-10 17:56:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4D5426BA.80400@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Shaun Thomas wrote:
> Hilariously, I'm not so sure that's what the OP wanted.
Someone to blame as a scapegoat for why his badly planned project had
failed. I've done several Oracle conversions before, and never met
someone who was so resistent to doing the right things for such a
conversion. You have to relatively flexible in your thinking to work
with the good and away from the bad parts of PostgreSQL for such a
project to succeed. I didn't hear a whole lot of "flexible" in that
discussion.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-02-10 18:01:42 | Re: Range Types (catversion.h) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 17:51:31 | Re: Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-10 18:26:44 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 17:51:31 | Re: Does auto-analyze work on dirty writes? |