Re: Per-column collation, the finale

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, the finale
Date: 2011-01-15 01:37:39
Message-ID: 4D30FA63.1030200@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em 14-01-2011 20:47, Robert Haas escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> I've been going over this patch with a fine-tooth comb for the last two
>> weeks, fixed some small bugs, added comments, made initdb a little
>> friendlier, but no substantial changes.
>>
>> I'm going to start working on SQL-level CREATE/DROP/ALTER COLLATION
>> support and associated things now.
>
> Maybe I'm all wet here, but isn't it time to commit what you've got
> and punt the things that aren't done to 9.2?
>
I think Peter want another person to take a look at his patch. I personally
would like to eyeball his patch (but it will be during the week).

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-01-15 01:39:25 Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2011-01-15 01:33:11 Re: Named restore points